Search results for "exceptio vitiosae possessioni"

A proposito di D. 43.17.2 (Paul. 65 ad ed.)

2021

D. 43.17.2 (Paul. 65 ad ed.), in the opinion of Giovanni Nicosia, could be referred to the interdictum de vi rather than, as suggested by Otto Lenel, to the interdictum uti possidetis. According to the author, however, a careful examination of the source supports Lenel’s opinion